I thought I may want to bring this objective up on this forum. It seems like the best option to talk others on here.

I thought I may bring up the cost of water and food now a days. The economy is sinking.

It cost money for water, for it to get to your home. Pipes are not clean things.

People deliver food to your home that you just never met before/ and who you just don't know.

The soundness of your deliver driver may ask you for a larger tip for their time.

The business will ask your for a subscription for their business. And they will add a cost for the delivery fee or the service itself.

When you are thirsty and do not have water, and you don't drink "pipe water" with lead and asbestos. You have no way to get water. It is one company (sometimes).

That is no money and no water.

You will end up paying this person, or borrowed money, (or time) for that water.

You will have less money at the end of the purchase of water, and you will survive with this water, that will help you live.

This is the story for the driest places in the United States. There is no "fresh" water.

The story doesn't end there.

Water is a commitment by the public, by communities for health and many reasons.

Water is a necessity for living organisms/ living things.

Water is normal.

What is not normal is the price of water. The cost is way too much.

Water should not break the bank. It should not be nothing.

Water is required for working, and for life.

Water should have not requirements to have.

There is a high amount of water at all times.

Water is a security.

Water is important.

Water is safe.

Water is just...

So if this does teach you about water, maybe think about how it sounds when a subject, or "concept" is applied to the reality of food or water. It is a reality.

The soundness, the argument, the linear relation (can you see it on a graph, or a amount of numbers, can you plug it in...)

You are not required to take a test for water? Sometimes.

Are you required to be productive/ stay clear/ positive when handling food-- I hope so!

What are your thoughts.

The economy is one thing. The big "500". Those are the individuals in the world-- the "top 1%", who read and discern this information.

Maybe no pay.

However those are the people who just look at the numbers and "observe"-- meaning listen and read.

(Actually) the numbers are real low.

Less than the 500 viewers, something like this story would normally would have.

If it was a podcast, and there was one episode in the entire world that covered food deliveries, it would be low--- less than 200.

If it was a major city infrastructure and you make a campaign against assault, or perhaps intoxication--- the view count is really low, the contact methods are also really low.

Less than 200-- for almost a year. That might be 500 people right there.

No concern.

So what are my thoughts?

M2i.biz/. (...)